In a significant legal development, the Australian Federal Court delivered a ruling on Friday that favored the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in a case concerning an unlicensed cryptocurrency platform accused of misleading customers.
The court’s attention was drawn to the actions of BPS Financial, a crypto promoter based in Gold Coast, which allegedly violated regulations by promoting an unlicensed cryptocurrency wallet. Specifically, the company was accused of misleading customers while marketing the ‘Qoin Wallet,’ a non-cash payment facility utilizing a cryptocurrency token known as ‘Qoin.’
ASIC Chair Joe Longo highlighted the inherent risks associated with crypto assets, emphasizing the volatility and potential hazards involved. Longo underscored the crucial importance of ensuring that cryptocurrency providers possess the necessary licenses and authorizations, while also emphasizing the need for investors to be equipped with clear and accurate information regarding their investments.
Justice Downes, presiding over the case, concluded that BPS Financial had violated the Corporations Act by operating without an Australian Financial Services license. Additionally, the court found that the firm had misled customers by making false representations regarding the Qoin Wallet.
This ruling serves as a stern reminder of the regulatory scrutiny surrounding the cryptocurrency industry and the legal obligations incumbent upon firms operating within this space. It underscores the imperative for cryptocurrency providers to adhere to regulatory requirements and provide transparent and accurate information to investors, thereby fostering trust and confidence in the burgeoning cryptocurrency market.
ASIC has made accusations regarding the controversial Qoin cryptocurrency.
The introduction of Qoin to the Australian market in early 2020 sparked considerable attention, with promises of substantial returns for investors. One of the assertions made by the company was the official registration of the Qoin Wallet, a claim that later proved to be unsubstantiated.
In the wake of these assertions, business owners began expressing doubts about the viability and sustainability of the digital currency. Concerns were raised regarding potential misinformation and the inability of some users to liquidate their investments.
In response to mounting concerns, Australia’s corporate regulator initiated legal action, alleging that advertisements promoting Qoin had misled consumers by creating false impressions. These adverts assured investors that they could easily exchange Qoin for other currencies and highlighted the availability of merchants accepting the digital currency.
It’s estimated that over 79,000 individuals and entities invested in Qoin under the belief that the product complied with financial services laws. However, in 2022, ASIC refuted this assumption, initiating civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against BPS Financial, the company behind Qoin.
Sarah Court, ASIC’s deputy chair, emphasized the significance of the case, noting that it marked the first instance where court proceedings had been pursued alleging that a crypto asset offering, such as the Qoin facility, constituted a financial product. This legal action underscored ASIC’s commitment to upholding the integrity of financial markets and protecting consumers from misleading or deceptive practices within the cryptocurrency sector.
READ MORE ABOUT: Airdrop farmers are now spamming GitHub in light of Starknet, Celestia distributions
